Torts - Property Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 45,021
WALSH v. ROKOKO ELECTRONICS
as 2:2025cv05340
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW R. WALSH
Defendant:
ROKOKO ELECTRONICS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Mohindra v. Boghara et al
as 2:2025cv02050
Plaintiff:
Raghav Mohindra
Defendant:
Haresh Boghara, Jignasa Dhanani, First State Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Martinez v. Titan Equipment, LLC et al
as 4:2025cv00852
Plaintiff:
Jose Martinez
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. and Titan Equipment, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Choe v. TD Bank N.A.
as 1:2025cv04923
Plaintiff:
Jerry Choe
Defendant:
TD Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 ef Electronic Fund Transfer Act
Gottfried v. Okai-Koi
as 1:2025cv04929
Plaintiff:
Gabe Gottfried
Defendant:
Khadia Okai-Koi
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Swetz v. Church & Dwight Co. Inc.
as 7:2025cv04932
Plaintiff:
Bryan Swetz
Defendant:
Church & Dwight Co. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Divine Serenity Shop, Inc., et al v. Plant Identification, Inc., et al
as 25-11994
Plaintiff:
DIVINE SERENITY SHOP, INC. and MADE WITH LASER, LLC
Defendant:
PLANT IDENTIFICATION, INC., CHEN LI, DANIELLE CICCOLI and others
White v. PayPal Holdings Inc et al
as 5:2025cv04884
Defendant:
Honey, PayPal Holdings Inc and The Honey Science Corporation
Plaintiff:
Leah White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Trout v. High Side Technology, Inc. et al
as 3:2025cv01485
Plaintiff:
Joel D. Trout, II
Defendant:
High Side Technology, Inc., J. Terry Simpson, Christopher Bartolomei and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 2302 Federal Whistleblowing Act / Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA)
Hattie K. Arres v. Langer Juice Company, Inc.
as 5:2025cv01451
Plaintiff:
Hattie Arres
Defendant:
Langer Juice Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
