Connecticut Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 53
McCulley v. Berchem
as 3:2025cv00766
Plaintiff:
Leona Renee McCulley
Defendant:
Jonathan Berchem
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Al Qadomi et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv01852
Plaintiff:
INFINITY SMOKE SHOP, LLC, ABDUL AL QADOMI, Brothers P.C. LLC doing business as Puff City Milford and others
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, William Tong, Patrick J. Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Calderon v. CoBank et al
as 3:2024cv01603
Defendant:
Janet C. Hall, CoBank, Deutsche Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Pablo Calderon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Mohammadi v. Tong et al
as 3:2024cv01473
Defendant:
Marcus Campbell, Diedre Gifford, Andrea Barton Reeves and others
Plaintiff:
Abbas Mohammadi, Columbia Oral Maxillofacial Imaging, L.L.C. and Columbia Dental PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
We The Patriots USA, Inc. et al v. Lamont
as 3:2023cv00737
Plaintiff:
We The Patriots USA, Inc., Matthew Sherman, Brandon Tischer and others
Defendant:
Ned Lamont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Milford Christian Church et al v. Russell-Tucker et al
as 3:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Milford Christian Church, James Loomer, Janet Parady and others
Defendant:
Charlene M Russell-Tucker, Beth Bye and Manisha Juthani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berka v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv01629
Plaintiff:
George Berka
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, William Tong and City Of Middletown
Severino v. Spagnola et al
as 3:2022cv01529
Plaintiff:
Mr. Dillon Severino and Dillon Severino
Defendant:
Fernando Spagnola, Ned Lamont, James Rovella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Connecticut State Police Union v. Rovella
as 3:2020cv01147
Plaintiff:
Connecticut State Police Union
Defendant:
James Rovella
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
