Georgia Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 128
Bramlett v. RES 360 LLC et al
as 1:2025cv03312
Plaintiff:
Veronica Bramlett
Defendant:
RES 360 LLC and Peach City Properties LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Wilson v. Grocery Delivery E-Services USA Inc.
as 1:2025cv03262
Plaintiff:
Erin Wilson
Defendant:
Grocery Delivery E-Services USA Inc. doing business as EveryPlate
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Wilson v. Tradercodes, LLC
as 1:2025cv03211
Plaintiff:
Erin Wilson
Defendant:
Tradercodes, LLC doing business as Algo Exchange
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Wilson v. CookUnity LLC
as 1:2025cv03237
Plaintiff:
Erin Wilson
Defendant:
CookUnity LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Wilson v. QuikAid, Inc.
as 1:2025cv03238
Plaintiff:
Erin Wilson
Defendant:
QuikAid, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Pedigree v. Humans, Inc.
as 1:2025cv03100
Plaintiff:
Yahni Pedigree
Defendant:
Humans, Inc. doing business as Flip
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Taylor v. Bruce Fink, D.D.S., P.C.
as 1:2025cv03099
Plaintiff:
Sara Taylor
Defendant:
Bruce Fink, D.D.S., P.C.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Newell v. Yoke Global Inc.
as 1:2025cv03049
Plaintiff:
Jourey Newell
Defendant:
Yoke Global Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Radvansky v. 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc.
as 1:2025cv02811
Plaintiff:
Ethan Radvansky
Defendant:
1-800-Flowers.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Radvansky v. Comfortwear Collections International Inc.
as 1:2025cv02810
Plaintiff:
Ethan Radvansky
Defendant:
Comfortwear Collections International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
